The Impact of an In Situ Simulation Intervention on Interprofessional Collaboration during Critical Events.
CCCF ePoster library. Villemure C. Oct 28, 2015; 117318; P107
Catherine Villemure
Catherine Villemure
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.

You may also access this content "anytime, anywhere" with the Free MULTILEARNING App for iOS and Android
Abstract
Rate & Comment (0)
P107


Topic: Education Science


The Impact of an In Situ Simulation Intervention on Interprofessional Collaboration during Critical Events.



Catherine Villemure, L. Georgescu, I. Tanoubi, J. Dubé, J. Houle

Intensive Care Unit, CIUSSS-MCQ, Trois-Rivières, Canada | Anesthésie, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Canada | Anesthésie, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Canada | Soins Intensifs, CIUSSS-MCQ - Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada | Sciences Infirmières, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada

Introduction: Due to potentially life-threatening conditions and high risks of errors, critical care frequently requires a prompt team intervention. Effective communication and teamwork are central components of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and miscommunication among professionals during crisis events management may directly affect the patient safety. Developing strategies to enhance IPC among critical care workers should be prioritized in critical care units. In Situ Simulation (ISS), the simulation used in the real clinical setting, can be particularly valuable to improve patient safety because it brings together the elements of the care team and the environment. However, its impact on IPC is still to demonstrate.

Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of an ISS based training on self-assessed IPC during crisis events management among an interprofessional care team. The secondary outcome is the impact on professionals satisfaction towards their coworkers.

Methods: Quasi-experimental study, pretest and posttest design with a paired control group. A convenience sample (N=69) was recruited among the healthcare professionals of the regular PACU team of two university hospitals, including nurses, respiratory therapists, anesthesia residents and staff anesthesiologists. Thirty three participants were in experimental group and 36 were in control group. The intervention consists of a 6-hour simulation based team training, on the crisis resources management principles, given by simulation based medical education experts. Three scenarios were used, composed of typical deteriorating cases encountered in critical care settings, and followed by a debriefing period supported by the video recording of the simulation. The measured outcomes were IPC and professionals teamwork satisfaction, evaluated by the Collaborative Work Questionnaire (Cronbach alpha=0.85-0.93) and the Satisfaction Towards Coworkers Questionnaire (Cronbach alpha=0.91), both on a 7-points Likert scale. The Collaborative Work Questionnaire allows evaluating global IPC and 4 domains (communication, synchronicity, explicit and implicit coordination).Questionnaires were answered at 3 periods of time: before the intervention (T1), immediately after (T2), and 6 to 8 weeks later (T3).

Results: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Global IPC was significantly increased in the experimental group from T1 to T3 (means 4.41±0.76 vs 4.85±0.88; p=0.018), whereas no difference was observed in the control group (means 5.19±0.79 vs 5.19±0.89; p=0.359). Linear mixed model indicates that the change in global IPC was different between groups (F2,67=3,88; p=0,025). Also, an improvement of explicit coordination was observed from T1 to T3 in the experimental group (means 3.75±0.96 vs 4.54±1.14; p<0.001), but not in the control group (means 4.44±0.92 vs 4.68±1.11; p=0.054). The interaction effect (group x time) for communication was different between groups (F2,67=4.09; p=0.021). Changes in other domains of IPC were not different between groups (p>0.05). Satisfaction towards coworkers was high and similar in both groups at baseline (means 5.95±0.53 and 5.75±0.98; p=0.287). The intervention had no significant impact on this variable.

Conclusion: An ISS based team training had a significant impact on self-assessed IPC during crisis events management in our study. The use of ISS should be promoted among critical care teams, in order to teach communication skills and enhance IPC contributing to patient safety.

References: - Baker, G. R., Norton, P. G., Flintoft, V., Blais, R., Brown, A., Cox, J., . . . Majumdar, S. R. (2004). The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(11), 1678-1686.
-
Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 93(1), 170.
- Blais, R., Tamblyn, R., Bartlett, G., Tre, G., & St-Germain, D. (2005). Incidence d’évènements indésirables dans les hôpitaux québécois. Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé. Université de Montréal.
- Chiocchio, F., Grenier, S., O'Neill, T. A., Savaria, K., & Willms, J. D. (2012). The effects of collaboration on performance: A multilevel validation in project teams. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 4(1), 1-37.
-
Consortium pancanadien pour l'interprofessionalisme en santé. (2010). Référentiel national de compétences en matière d’interprofessionnalisme. Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique: College of Health Disciplines, Université de la Colombie-Britannique.
- Dietz, A. S., Pronovost, P. J., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Wyskiel, R., Marsteller, J. A., Thompson, D. A., & Rosen, M. A. (2014). A systematic review of teamwork in the intensive care unit: What do we know about teamwork, team tasks, and improvement strategies? Journal of Critical Care, 29(6), 908-914.
-
Etchells, E., & Mittman, N. (2010). L'aspect économique de la sécurité des patients dans un établissement de soins de courte durée (pp. 76 pages). Canada: ICSP.
- Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To err is human : building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- OMS. (2015). Thèmes de santé. Sécurité du patient. Page consultée à http://www.who.int/topics/patient_safety/fr/
- Rose, L. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?*. Nursing in Critical Care, 16(1), 5-10.
- Rosen, M. A., Hunt, E. A., Pronovost, P. J., Federowicz, M. A., & Weaver, S. J. (2012). In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: a systematic review. The Journal Of Continuing Education In The Health Professions, 32(4), 243-254.
-
Rothschild, J. M., Landrigan, C. P., Cronin, J. W., Kaushal, R., Lockley, S. W., Burdick, E., . . . Czeisler, C. A. (2005). The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care*. Critical care medicine, 33(8), 1694-1700.
- The Joint Commission. (2013a). Sentinel Event Date - Root Causes by Event Type. Repéré à http://www.jointcommission.org/Sentinel_Event_Statistics/.
- Weaver, S. J., Salas, E., Lyons, R., Lazzara, E. H., Rosen, M. A., Diazgranados, D., . . . King, H. (2010). Simulation-based team training at the sharp end: A qualitative study of simulation-based team training design, implementation, and evaluation in healthcare. Journal Of Emergencies, Trauma, And Shock, 3(4), 369-377.
- Weller, J. M., Torrie, J., Boyd, M., Frengley, R., Garden, A., Ng, W. L., & Frampton, C. (2014). Improving team information sharing with a structured call-out in anaesthetic emergencies: a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 112(6), 1042-1049.
    This eLearning portal is powered by:
    This eLearning portal is powered by MULTIEPORTAL
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.


Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.


Save Settings